The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its sprawling network of affiliates, collectively known as the Sangh Parivar, form a formidable force in India’s socio-political and cultural landscape. From grassroots social initiatives to shaping global narratives, their reach is vast. Yet, one question looms large: Who funds this ideological powerhouse? Drawing from recent investigations, historical data, and credible reports, this article explores the intricate web of domestic and international funding that sustains the Sangh Parivar, while addressing the controversies and gaps that obscure the full picture.
Domestic Funding: Grassroots or Government-Backed?
The RSS often emphasizes self-reliance, citing “gurudakshina”—voluntary donations from its millions of swayamsevaks—as a primary funding source. Members interviewed by The Caravan describe this as, “Khud se kartey hain ya kabhi kabhi samaj ke logon se madad mil jati hai” (We do it ourselves or sometimes we get help from people in society) (The Caravan, 2020). However, the scale of the Sangh’s operations, encompassing thousands of schools, healthcare programs, and relief efforts, points to more substantial financial streams.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Public Donations
Sewa Bharati, a key Sangh affiliate, leverages India’s corporate philanthropy landscape. Since the 2013 Companies Act mandated CSR spending, Indian corporations have channeled funds to Sangh NGOs for education initiatives like Ekal Vidyalayas and healthcare camps (Frontline, 2021). While precise figures are rarely disclosed, Sewa Bharati’s prominence as a CSR recipient is well-documented, complemented by public donations from sympathizers (Sagar Times). This dual stream bolsters the Sangh’s social work, reinforcing its grassroots image.
Government Support During Crises
The Indian government has played a significant role, particularly during emergencies. During the COVID-19 lockdown, 736 Sangh-affiliated NGOs under Rashtriya Sewa Bharati were authorized to access the State Disaster Relief Fund (SDRF) and subsidized foodgrains from the Food Corporation of India (FCI) (The Caravan, 2020). Niti Aayog further encouraged CSR contributions to these NGOs, though specific disbursals remain undisclosed (Scroll.in, 2014). This state-backed support, especially during crises, contrasts with the RSS’s narrative of financial independence, highlighting a reliance on public resources.
International Funding: The U.S. Connection
While domestic funding is significant, the Sangh Parivar’s global financial network—particularly in the United States—reveals a more complex picture. The Indian diaspora, especially in tech hubs like Silicon Valley, has been a key player, with funds flowing through nonprofits, family foundations, and even federal relief programs.
India Development and Relief Fund (IDRF)
Based in Maryland, the IDRF has been a major conduit for channeling diaspora donations to Sangh affiliates in India. Between 1994 and 2000, it disbursed approximately $4 million to organizations like Sewa Bharati and Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram, raised largely from Indian-American professionals at companies like Cisco and Hewlett-Packard (The Times of India; Frontline). A 2002 report, The Foreign Exchange of Hate, estimated that 70% of IDRF’s funds supported Hindutva-aligned groups (Scroll.in, 2014). While IDRF claims to focus on development, its historical ties to the Sangh Parivar remain a point of contention.
U.S. Federal COVID-19 Relief Funds
In 2021, U.S.-based Sangh-linked organizations accessed Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans during the pandemic. Sewa International received $150,621, while the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) obtained $388,064 (Al Jazeera, 2021; National Herald). Sewa International’s broader COVID-19 fundraising, including a $2.5 million donation from Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, raised over $20 million, prompting concerns about ideological motives (Frontline, 2021). Both groups maintain these funds supported legitimate relief efforts, but critics argue they indirectly bolstered Hindutva advocacy.
Family Foundations: Wealthy Donors with a Cause
Prominent Indian-American families have significantly supported Sangh-affiliated causes through private foundations:
- Bhutada Family Foundation: Donated over $1 million between 2005 and 2018 to groups like HAF ($362,242), Sewa International ($496,495), and Ekal Vidyalaya ($145,415), reflecting deep ties to the Sangh ecosystem (Frontline, 2021; The Times of India).
- Dharma Civilization Foundation: Contributed over $13 million from 2012 to 2016 to establish academic programs promoting Hindutva perspectives at U.S. universities, such as UC Irvine (National Herald; Sagar Times).
- Uberoi Foundation: Spent at least $561,000 between 2010 and 2016 on initiatives like revising California public school textbooks and funding the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America’s (VHPA) Hindu University of America (Frontline, 2021; National Herald).
These foundations underscore a strategic effort to shape cultural and academic narratives abroad, though recent data post-2018 is limited.
Beyond the U.S.: A Global Network?
The Sangh’s global presence, with shakhas (branches) in countries like the UK, Canada, and Kenya since 1947, suggests potential funding from other diaspora communities (Frontline, 2021). However, specific data from these regions is scarce, leaving the U.S. as the most documented international source. Claims of funding through tax havens or international organizations like USAID, as raised in some discussions, lack concrete evidence in available reports.
Controversies and Allegations: The Shadow of Ideology
The Sangh Parivar’s funding is not without controversy, with critics questioning the transparency and intent behind its financial flows.
Historical Allegations of Foreign Interference
The Indian National Congress has historically alleged that the RSS received U.S. funding, including from the CIA, during the 1960s and 1970s to destabilize Congress-led governments (The Times of India). These claims, rooted in Cold War-era political tensions, lack declassified evidence and remain speculative. While U.S. interest in Indian politics during that period is documented, no direct link to RSS funding has emerged.
Misuse of Funds for Hindutva Promotion
More recent concerns focus on the use of funds to promote Hindutva ideology. Reports suggest that diaspora contributions have supported efforts to influence educational content, such as California textbook revisions in 2005-06, and lobbying on issues like Kashmir (National Herald; Wikipedia). Sewa International’s COVID-19 relief campaigns, while delivering aid, have been criticized for building goodwill for Hindutva-aligned agendas (Frontline, 2021). The Sangh Parivar denies these claims, citing audits and transparent operations, but the overlap between social work and ideological outreach remains a gray area.
The Bigger Picture: Transparency and Gaps
The Sangh Parivar’s funding is a complex tapestry of transparent and opaque sources. Domestically, CSR and government support provide a robust foundation, while internationally, U.S.-based nonprofits and family foundations contribute millions. A 2022 NewsClick report estimated that seven Sangh-linked U.S. groups spent $158.9 million between 2001 and 2019, offering a glimpse into the scale of diaspora funding (NewsClick, 2022).
Yet, significant gaps persist. Recent data (post-2021) is sparse, possibly due to India’s tightened Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) or reduced reporting. Non-U.S. international funding remains under-documented, and claims of tax haven usage or USAID involvement lack substantiation. The RSS’s non-registered status further complicates scrutiny, as it operates through affiliates like Rashtriya Sewa Bharati.
Conclusion: A Call for Clarity
The RSS Sangh Parivar’s financial network reflects its dual identity: a grassroots movement rooted in community support and a global enterprise backed by strategic funding. Domestic CSR and government aid, paired with U.S. diaspora contributions, sustain its vast operations, from relief work to cultural advocacy. However, the lack of transparency—especially around government disbursals and recent international flows—fuels skepticism and controversy.
As the Sangh Parivar continues to shape India’s ideological landscape, understanding its funding is crucial. Greater disclosure, both from the Sangh and regulatory bodies, could demystify its financial web, separating legitimate social work from ideological agendas. Until then, the question of who funds the Sangh Parivar remains as complex as the organization itself.
Disclaimer: This article synthesizes publicly available information and does not endorse unverified claims. Readers are encouraged to explore primary sources for a deeper understanding.
Key Sources:
- Al Jazeera, National Herald, The Times of India, Sagar Times
No comments:
Post a Comment