Showing posts with label bollywood. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bollywood. Show all posts

Monday, April 28, 2025

The Stereotyping of Atheists in Old Bollywood Movies and TV Serials & A Call for Change

 

The Stereotyping of Atheists in Old Bollywood Movies and TV Serials & A Call for Change

For decades, Indian cinema, particularly Bollywood and regional films, along with TV serials, has perpetuated a predictable and problematic stereotype of atheists. The portrayal of atheists in these narratives often follows a formulaic arc: a young, brash, happy-go-lucky man who rejects the idea of God, dismisses religious practices, and is invariably depicted as arrogant, rude, or morally flawed. By the climax, a dramatic life event — be it a personal tragedy, a near-death experience, or a moral reckoning — forces him to abandon his atheism and embrace theism, often with a grand gesture of devotion. This trope, recycled in countless films and serials, not only misrepresents atheists but also fosters a culture of prejudice and misunderstanding. It’s time to challenge this narrative and advocate for more nuanced, respectful portrayals.

The Archetypal Atheist in Indian Cinema

The stereotypical atheist in Indian films is rarely a complex, relatable character. Instead, he (and it’s almost always a “he”) is crafted as a caricature designed to evoke disapproval from the audience. Films like Nastik (1954), Aakhri Sajda (1977), OMG — Oh My God! (2012), Gopala Gopala (2015, Telugu), Thunaivan (1969, Tamil), Paithrukam (1993, Malayalam), and Kadavul (1997, Tamil) follow a similar blueprint. The atheist protagonist is introduced as carefree but arrogant, dismissive of religious rituals, and often rude to those who hold faith dear. Why is humility or kindness rarely attributed to these characters? The answer seems clear: a humble, compassionate atheist might be too likable, too admirable, and that could challenge the narrative’s agenda.

The plot typically unfolds with the atheist facing a crisis — illness, financial ruin, or the loss of a loved one — that exposes the supposed “emptiness” of his worldview. By the film’s climax, he undergoes a transformation, often depicted in a dramatic scene where he prays, visits a temple, or publicly acknowledges the existence of a higher power. This conversion is framed as his redemption, reinforcing the idea that atheism is a flawed, temporary state that must be “corrected” through faith.

The Problem with the Stereotype

This repetitive portrayal is not just lazy storytelling; it’s harmful. By consistently depicting atheists as arrogant, rude, or morally deficient, these films precondition audiences to associate atheism with negative traits. Theists, on the other hand, are often shown as humble, kind, and morally superior, creating a binary where faith equates to virtue and disbelief to vice. This oversimplification ignores the diversity of beliefs and personalities in real life, where atheists, like anyone else, can be compassionate, ethical, and community-oriented.

The absence of positive atheist role models in these narratives is telling. Rarely, if ever, do we see a film where a kind, humble atheist faces challenges, remains true to their beliefs, and emerges stronger without converting to theism. Such a story would validate atheism as a legitimate worldview, but instead, the industry opts for conversion narratives that align with cultural norms and religious sentiments. This approach marginalizes atheists, portraying them as outliers who must be “fixed” to fit into society.

Cultural Impact and the Need for Change

The impact of these portrayals extends beyond the screen. In a country like India, where religion plays a central role in social and cultural life, such depictions reinforce biases against atheists. They perpetuate the misconception that atheism is synonymous with immorality or hubris, making it harder for atheists to be open about their beliefs without facing judgment or ostracism. By hammering the same script across decades, Bollywood and regional cinema have contributed to a culture of intolerance, where atheism is seen as something to be pitied or corrected rather than respected.

Moreover, these narratives fail to reflect the growing diversity of thought in modern India. Atheism and agnosticism are not new to the country — philosophical traditions like Charvaka and Jainism have long embraced non-theistic perspectives. Yet, mainstream media rarely acknowledges this intellectual heritage or the lived experiences of contemporary atheists who lead fulfilling, ethical lives without religious faith.

A Path Forward: Nuanced Representation

To break this cycle of stereotyping, Indian cinema and television must embrace more authentic and diverse portrayals of atheists. Here are a few ways forward:

  1. Show Atheists as Multifaceted Characters: Atheists should be depicted with the same complexity as theist characters — capable of kindness, humility, and moral integrity. A story about an atheist who navigates life’s challenges with resilience and compassion, without converting, would be a refreshing departure from the norm.
  2. Challenge the Conversion Trope: Filmmakers should explore narratives where characters remain true to their atheistic beliefs, demonstrating that atheism is a valid and sustainable worldview. This would send a powerful message about respecting individual choices.
  3. Highlight Ethical Atheism: Stories that showcase atheists contributing to their communities — through charity, activism, or personal relationships — would counter the stereotype of the “selfish” or “arrogant” atheist.
  4. Engage with India’s Non-Theistic Traditions: Drawing on India’s rich history of non-theistic philosophies could provide a culturally rooted framework for portraying atheism positively.
  5. Promote Dialogue, Not Division: Films and serials should move away from pitting atheism against theism in a simplistic good-versus-evil framework. Instead, they could explore the nuances of belief and disbelief, fostering understanding rather than judgment.

Conclusion

The stereotyping of atheists in old Bollywood movies and TV serials is a disservice to both storytelling and society. By recycling the same tired narrative of the arrogant atheist who must be redeemed through faith, these productions perpetuate harmful misconceptions and marginalize a significant group of people. It’s time for Indian cinema to evolve, to tell stories that reflect the diversity of human experience and respect atheism as a legitimate worldview. By portraying atheists as complex, compassionate, and steadfast in their beliefs, filmmakers can challenge stereotypes, reduce prejudice, and contribute to a more inclusive cultural narrative. Let’s move beyond the clichés and tell stories that truly resonate with the pluralistic spirit of modern India.


Sunday, April 27, 2025

Why ANI ancestry dominates Bollywood


Why ANI ancestry dominates Bollywood

Bollywood’s obsession with lighter skin and sharp features didn’t start with colonialism — the roots run far deeper, into India’s ancient history.

Even today, Indian cinema (including Tollywood) reflects these old preferences. Here’s how it happened — with examples.


1. Bollywood Evolved in North India

Bollywood began in Mumbai (then Bombay), a city historically tied to northern India through migration from Punjab, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.
 Northern and northwestern Indians generally carry more ANI (Ancestral North Indian) ancestry — genetically linked to Central Asian, Persian, and early Indo-European groups.

Thus, the early faces of Bollywood — from Raj Kapoor to Dev Anand — often showcased lighter skin, straighter noses, and taller frames, typical of ANI-heavy populations.

Even today, many leading actors like Hrithik Roshan and Kareena Kapoor Khan come from families rooted in North India, carrying forward that visual template.


2. Beauty Standards: Pre-Colonial, Mughal, and Colonial Influence

The preference for fair skin in India long predates British colonialism.

Ancient Hindu texts such as the Manusmriti and Puranic stories often describe gods and ideal humans as having radiant, golden, or fair complexions.
 For instance, Lord Krishna — whose name literally means “dark” — is sometimes visually depicted in later eras with lighter or bluish skin to soften his “darkness” in art and literature.

During Mughal rule, this bias deepened. Mughal miniatures often portrayed nobility with pale skin tones, drawing from Persian aesthetics where light skin symbolized elite status.
 Look at historical love stories like Anarkali and Salim — Anarkali was mythologized as a breathtakingly fair woman.

By the time the British arrived, India already equated fairness with wealth, refinement, and desirability. Colonial rule only codified this hierarchy — legally and socially.

Bollywood, reflecting society, continued the trend.
 Fair-skinned stars like Madhubala, Meena Kumari, Sadhana, and later Aishwarya Rai became iconic for their ethereal, light-skinned beauty.


3. Class and Access to Opportunities

Higher social groups historically had greater ANI ancestry — and by extension, better access to wealth, education, and opportunity.
 Cinema, being expensive to enter and risky in early decades, became dominated by elites.

For example, Prithviraj Kapoor, the patriarch of Bollywood’s Kapoor dynasty, hailed from a literate, influential Punjabi family.
 Similarly, Dilip Kumar (born Muhammad Yusuf Khan) came from a well-to-do Pathan family.

Their urban, connected backgrounds — along with their socially “approved” appearance — helped them thrive in the nascent industry.


4. Urban Migration Patterns

Migration patterns to Mumbai and other cities played a huge role too.

Most early Bollywood stars — such as Ashok Kumar, Dev Anand, Rajendra Kumar, and Sunil Dutt — were products of urban migration waves dominated by relatively well-off northern families.

Wealthier northern families had the means to send children to arts colleges, drama schools, or simply to support a struggling acting career — luxuries that most rural Indians couldn’t afford.


5. Tollywood’s Parallel Bias

Interestingly, even in Tollywood (Telugu cinema), where male heroes like Chiranjeevi, Prabhas, or Allu Arjun often sport darker, more Dravidian features proudly, the female leads often tell a different story.

Heroines are frequently imported from North India:
 Kajal Aggarwal (Mumbai, Punjabi family), Tamannaah Bhatia (Mumbai, Sindhi family), Hansika Motwani (Mumbai, Sindhi family), and Rakul Preet Singh (Delhi, Punjabi family) — all fair-skinned, north-origin actresses dominating Telugu screens.

Even Pooja Hegde — although born in Karnataka — fits the pan-Indian fair-skin aesthetic preferred for female leads.

Thus, the “fairness fixation” isn’t just a Bollywood quirk — it’s a pan-Indian phenomenon, affecting casting choices even in southern industries that otherwise celebrate darker-skinned male heroes.


In Short:

Historical north Indian dominance +
 Pre-colonial, Mughal, and colonial beauty standards +
 Class-based access to elite opportunities =
 A film industry where ANI-featured faces became (and still often remain) the default.


But Times Are Changing

Modern Indian cinema is gradually shifting.

Actors like Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Vijay Sethupathi, Dhanush, and actresses like Sai Pallavi are breaking traditional beauty norms, gaining immense popularity despite not fitting the old “fair-skinned” ideal.

OTT platforms have further democratized opportunities — allowing talent from every part of India, regardless of skin tone or facial features, to shine.

The change is slow — but it’s happening.
 Indian cinema, like Indian society, is beginning to confront and question its oldest biases.


If you enjoyed this article, follow me for more pieces decoding Indian culture, history, and society.


Inside the BJP-RSS Digital Machinery: How India’s Most Powerful Political Network Shapes Online Narratives

  Inside the BJP-RSS Digital Machinery: How India’s Most Powerful Political Network Shapes Online Narratives The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP...