Why ANI ancestry dominates Bollywood
Bollywood’s obsession with lighter skin and sharp features didn’t start with colonialism — the roots run far deeper, into India’s ancient history.
Even today, Indian cinema (including Tollywood) reflects these old preferences. Here’s how it happened — with examples.
1. Bollywood Evolved in North India
Bollywood began in Mumbai (then Bombay), a city historically tied to northern India through migration from Punjab, Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.
Northern and northwestern Indians generally carry more ANI (Ancestral North Indian) ancestry — genetically linked to Central Asian, Persian, and early Indo-European groups.
Thus, the early faces of Bollywood — from Raj Kapoor to Dev Anand — often showcased lighter skin, straighter noses, and taller frames, typical of ANI-heavy populations.
Even today, many leading actors like Hrithik Roshan and Kareena Kapoor Khan come from families rooted in North India, carrying forward that visual template.
2. Beauty Standards: Pre-Colonial, Mughal, and Colonial Influence
The preference for fair skin in India long predates British colonialism.
Ancient Hindu texts such as the Manusmriti and Puranic stories often describe gods and ideal humans as having radiant, golden, or fair complexions.
For instance, Lord Krishna — whose name literally means “dark” — is sometimes visually depicted in later eras with lighter or bluish skin to soften his “darkness” in art and literature.
During Mughal rule, this bias deepened. Mughal miniatures often portrayed nobility with pale skin tones, drawing from Persian aesthetics where light skin symbolized elite status.
Look at historical love stories like Anarkali and Salim — Anarkali was mythologized as a breathtakingly fair woman.
By the time the British arrived, India already equated fairness with wealth, refinement, and desirability. Colonial rule only codified this hierarchy — legally and socially.
Bollywood, reflecting society, continued the trend.
Fair-skinned stars like Madhubala, Meena Kumari, Sadhana, and later Aishwarya Rai became iconic for their ethereal, light-skinned beauty.
3. Class and Access to Opportunities
Higher social groups historically had greater ANI ancestry — and by extension, better access to wealth, education, and opportunity.
Cinema, being expensive to enter and risky in early decades, became dominated by elites.
For example, Prithviraj Kapoor, the patriarch of Bollywood’s Kapoor dynasty, hailed from a literate, influential Punjabi family.
Similarly, Dilip Kumar (born Muhammad Yusuf Khan) came from a well-to-do Pathan family.
Their urban, connected backgrounds — along with their socially “approved” appearance — helped them thrive in the nascent industry.
4. Urban Migration Patterns
Migration patterns to Mumbai and other cities played a huge role too.
Most early Bollywood stars — such as Ashok Kumar, Dev Anand, Rajendra Kumar, and Sunil Dutt — were products of urban migration waves dominated by relatively well-off northern families.
Wealthier northern families had the means to send children to arts colleges, drama schools, or simply to support a struggling acting career — luxuries that most rural Indians couldn’t afford.
5. Tollywood’s Parallel Bias
Interestingly, even in Tollywood (Telugu cinema), where male heroes like Chiranjeevi, Prabhas, or Allu Arjun often sport darker, more Dravidian features proudly, the female leads often tell a different story.
Heroines are frequently imported from North India:
Kajal Aggarwal (Mumbai, Punjabi family), Tamannaah Bhatia (Mumbai, Sindhi family), Hansika Motwani (Mumbai, Sindhi family), and Rakul Preet Singh (Delhi, Punjabi family) — all fair-skinned, north-origin actresses dominating Telugu screens.
Even Pooja Hegde — although born in Karnataka — fits the pan-Indian fair-skin aesthetic preferred for female leads.
Thus, the “fairness fixation” isn’t just a Bollywood quirk — it’s a pan-Indian phenomenon, affecting casting choices even in southern industries that otherwise celebrate darker-skinned male heroes.
In Short:
Historical north Indian dominance +
Pre-colonial, Mughal, and colonial beauty standards +
Class-based access to elite opportunities =
A film industry where ANI-featured faces became (and still often remain) the default.
But Times Are Changing
Modern Indian cinema is gradually shifting.
Actors like Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Vijay Sethupathi, Dhanush, and actresses like Sai Pallavi are breaking traditional beauty norms, gaining immense popularity despite not fitting the old “fair-skinned” ideal.
OTT platforms have further democratized opportunities — allowing talent from every part of India, regardless of skin tone or facial features, to shine.
The change is slow — but it’s happening.
Indian cinema, like Indian society, is beginning to confront and question its oldest biases.
If you enjoyed this article, follow me for more pieces decoding Indian culture, history, and society.
